0.04/0.09	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.04/0.10	% Command    : run_E %s %d THM
0.09/0.30	% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
0.09/0.30	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.09/0.30	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.09/0.30	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.09/0.30	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.09/0.30	% CPULimit   : 960
0.09/0.30	% WCLimit    : 120
0.09/0.30	% DateTime   : Tue Aug  9 02:11:11 EDT 2022
0.09/0.30	% CPUTime    : 
0.14/0.40	Running higher-order on 8 cores theorem proving
0.14/0.40	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=120 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
0.14/0.40	# Version: 3.0pre003-ho
0.14/0.41	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
0.14/0.41	# Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.14/0.41	# Starting post_as_ho12 with 120s (1) cores
0.14/0.41	# Starting new_bool_9 with 120s (1) cores
0.14/0.41	# Starting post_as_ho1 with 120s (1) cores
0.14/0.41	# Starting post_as_ho4 with 120s (1) cores
0.14/0.41	# Starting post_as_ho2 with 120s (1) cores
0.14/0.41	# Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 120s (1) cores
0.14/0.41	# Starting full_lambda_10 with 120s (1) cores
0.14/0.41	# Starting new_ho_8 with 120s (1) cores
0.14/0.41	# post_as_ho1 with pid 396 completed with status 0
0.14/0.41	# Result found by post_as_ho1
0.14/0.41	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
0.14/0.41	# Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.14/0.41	# Starting post_as_ho12 with 120s (1) cores
0.14/0.41	# Starting new_bool_9 with 120s (1) cores
0.14/0.41	# Starting post_as_ho1 with 120s (1) cores
0.14/0.41	# No SInE strategy applied
0.14/0.41	# Search class: HGUNF-FFSF00-SSSFFMBN
0.14/0.41	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 120 seconds (120 total)
0.14/0.41	# Starting ehoh_best_nonlift with 65s (1) cores
0.14/0.41	# ehoh_best_nonlift with pid 403 completed with status 0
0.14/0.41	# Result found by ehoh_best_nonlift
0.14/0.41	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
0.14/0.41	# Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.14/0.41	# Starting post_as_ho12 with 120s (1) cores
0.14/0.41	# Starting new_bool_9 with 120s (1) cores
0.14/0.41	# Starting post_as_ho1 with 120s (1) cores
0.14/0.41	# No SInE strategy applied
0.14/0.41	# Search class: HGUNF-FFSF00-SSSFFMBN
0.14/0.41	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 120 seconds (120 total)
0.14/0.41	# Starting ehoh_best_nonlift with 65s (1) cores
0.14/0.41	# Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
0.14/0.41	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.14/0.41	
0.14/0.41	# Proof found!
0.14/0.41	# SZS status Theorem
0.14/0.41	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.14/0.41	thf(decl_22, type, epred1_0: $o > $o).
0.14/0.41	thf(cOMEGA_EXAMPLE, conjecture, (![X1:$o > $o]:(((X1 @ (($true)))<=>(X1 @ ((($true)<=($true))))))&?[X2:$o > $o > $o]:(((((X2 @ (($true)) @ (($true)))&~((X2 @ (~($true)) @ (($true)))))&~((X2 @ (($true)) @ (~($true)))))&(X2 @ (~($true)) @ (~($true)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', cOMEGA_EXAMPLE)).
0.14/0.41	thf(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~((![X1:$o > $o]:(((X1 @ (($true)))<=>(X1 @ $true)))&?[X2:$o > $o > $o]:(((((X2 @ (($true)) @ (($true)))&~(X2 @ (~($true)) @ (($true))))&~(X2 @ (($true)) @ (~($true))))&(X2 @ (~($true)) @ (~($true))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cOMEGA_EXAMPLE])])])).
0.14/0.41	thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ![X6:$o > $o > $o]:(((~(epred1_0 @ (($true)))|~(epred1_0 @ $true)|(~(X6 @ (($true)) @ (($true)))|(X6 @ (~($true)) @ (($true)))|(X6 @ (($true)) @ (~($true)))|~(X6 @ (~($true)) @ (~($true)))))&((epred1_0 @ (($true)))|(epred1_0 @ $true)|(~(X6 @ (($true)) @ (($true)))|(X6 @ (~($true)) @ (($true)))|(X6 @ (($true)) @ (~($true)))|~(X6 @ (~($true)) @ (~($true))))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])])).
0.14/0.41	thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$o > $o > $o]:(((X2 @ (((($true))!=(($true)))) @ (($true)))|(X2 @ (($true)) @ (((($true))!=(($true)))))|~((epred1_0 @ (($true))))|~((epred1_0 @ (($true))))|~((X2 @ (($true)) @ (($true))))|~((X2 @ (((($true))!=(($true)))) @ (((($true))!=(($true)))))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.14/0.41	thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$o > $o > $o]:(((epred1_0 @ (($true)))|(epred1_0 @ (($true)))|(X2 @ (((($true))!=(($true)))) @ (($true)))|(X2 @ (($true)) @ (((($true))!=(($true)))))|~((X2 @ (($true)) @ (($true))))|~((X2 @ (((($true))!=(($true)))) @ (((($true))!=(($true)))))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.14/0.41	thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$o > $o > $o]:(((X2 @ (($true)) @ (((($true))!=(($true)))))|(X2 @ (((($true))!=(($true)))) @ (($true)))|~((epred1_0 @ (($true))))|~((X2 @ (($true)) @ (($true))))|~((X2 @ (((($true))!=(($true)))) @ (((($true))!=(($true)))))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])).
0.14/0.41	thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$o > $o > $o]:(((epred1_0 @ (($true)))|(X2 @ (($true)) @ (((($true))!=(($true)))))|(X2 @ (((($true))!=(($true)))) @ (($true)))|~((X2 @ (($true)) @ (($true))))|~((X2 @ (((($true))!=(($true)))) @ (((($true))!=(($true)))))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])).
0.14/0.41	thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$o > $o > $o]:(((X2 @ (~($true)) @ (($true)))|(X2 @ (($true)) @ (~($true)))|~((X2 @ (($true)) @ (($true))))|~((X2 @ (~($true)) @ (~($true))))|~((epred1_0 @ (($true)))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])).
0.14/0.41	thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$o > $o > $o]:(((X2 @ (~($true)) @ (($true)))|(X2 @ (($true)) @ (~($true)))|(epred1_0 @ (($true)))|~((X2 @ (($true)) @ (($true))))|~((X2 @ (~($true)) @ (~($true)))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
0.14/0.41	thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ~((epred1_0 @ (($true)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(primitive_enumeration,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])])).
0.14/0.41	thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$o > $o > $o]:(((X2 @ (($true)) @ (~($true)))|(X2 @ (~($true)) @ (($true)))|~((X2 @ (($true)) @ (($true))))|~((X2 @ (~($true)) @ (~($true)))))), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_9])).
0.14/0.41	thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(primitive_enumeration,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])])]), ['proof']).
0.14/0.41	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.14/0.41	# Parsed axioms                        : 1
0.14/0.41	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
0.14/0.41	# Initial clauses                      : 2
0.14/0.41	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
0.14/0.41	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 2
0.14/0.41	# Processed clauses                    : 6
0.14/0.41	# ...of these trivial                  : 0
0.14/0.41	# ...subsumed                          : 1
0.14/0.41	# ...remaining for further processing  : 5
0.14/0.41	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
0.14/0.41	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.14/0.41	# Backward-subsumed                    : 1
0.14/0.41	# Backward-rewritten                   : 0
0.14/0.41	# Generated clauses                    : 38
0.14/0.41	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 4
0.14/0.41	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.14/0.41	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
0.14/0.41	# Paramodulations                      : 0
0.14/0.41	# Factorizations                       : 0
0.14/0.41	# NegExts                              : 0
0.14/0.41	# Equation resolutions                 : 0
0.14/0.41	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.14/0.41	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.14/0.41	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.14/0.41	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.14/0.41	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.14/0.41	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.14/0.41	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.14/0.41	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.14/0.41	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.14/0.41	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.14/0.41	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.14/0.41	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.14/0.41	# Current number of processed clauses  : 2
0.14/0.41	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 0
0.14/0.41	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.14/0.41	#    Negative unit clauses             : 1
0.14/0.41	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 1
0.14/0.41	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1
0.14/0.41	# ...number of literals in the above   : 5
0.14/0.41	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.14/0.41	# Current number of archived clauses   : 3
0.14/0.41	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1
0.14/0.41	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
0.14/0.41	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
0.14/0.41	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
0.14/0.41	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.14/0.41	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
0.14/0.41	# BW rewrite match successes           : 0
0.14/0.41	# Condensation attempts                : 0
0.14/0.41	# Condensation successes               : 0
0.14/0.41	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 1324
0.14/0.41	
0.14/0.41	# -------------------------------------------------
0.14/0.41	# User time                : 0.003 s
0.14/0.41	# System time              : 0.001 s
0.14/0.41	# Total time               : 0.004 s
0.14/0.41	# Maximum resident set size: 1776 pages
0.14/0.41	
0.14/0.41	# -------------------------------------------------
0.14/0.41	# User time                : 0.004 s
0.14/0.41	# System time              : 0.003 s
0.14/0.41	# Total time               : 0.007 s
0.14/0.41	# Maximum resident set size: 1696 pages
0.14/0.41	EOF